Proceeding contribution from Cheryl Gillan (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 1 December 2010. It occurred during Grand Committee proceedings (HC) on Comprehensive Spending Review.
Comprehensive Spending Review
My hon. Friend is making a sterling speech, and there are no bounds to his generosity in allowing people intervene. My hon. Friend will be pleased to know that I checked up on a written answer given to the right hon. Member for Cardiff South and Penarth, who, I believe, left the Committee with the impression that St Athan did not have a future. I have taken advice and checked the written answer from my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Defence, and in fact it states no such thing; the line on St Athan has not changed at all. I am sure all Members, on both sides of the Committee, will welcome the fact that we think that ““technical training co-located on as few sites as possible remains the best solution for our armed forces””, and that ““we have a new programme in place to assess requirement and options””—[Official Report, 23 November 2010; Vol. 519, c. 220W.] —something that the Labour party did not do when it was in government.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- WGC c50
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons Grand Committees
- Subjects
- Public expenditure Wales
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 20:57:44 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_697854
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_697854
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_697854