Proceeding contribution from Greg Knight (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Friday, 21 January 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Estates of Deceased Persons (Forfeiture Rule and Law of Succession) Bill.
Estates of Deceased Persons (Forfeiture Rule and Law of Succession) Bill
My hon. Friend is dealing with two important cases, but does he agree that they illustrate that our intestacy provisions are defective, and that the Bill seeks to put that right? The intestacy rules are a default mechanism, designed to help people who did not make a will, by channelling their property to their nearest blood relatives. Those cases show that there is a defect in that mechanism that is enabling further, distant relatives to benefit in those narrow cases, which is something that the Bill seeks to put right.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 521 c1143
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Children Homicide Gifts and endowments Inheritance tax Euthanasia Intestacy Probate Succession Wills Forfeiture Next of kin
- Legislation
- Estates of Deceased Persons (Forfeiture Rule and Law of Succession) Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 18:55:41 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_704138
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_704138
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_704138