Proceeding contribution from Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 26 January 2011. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Counterterrorism Review.
Counterterrorism Review
The noble Lord raises a perfectly fair question. The choices that we have made are not easy. In fact, I suggest to the House that there is no ideal solution here. Why have we gone for this method? I remind the noble Lord that we are not just going to place something in the Library or, indeed, suddenly bring the matter to the House without having gone through an important part of the process—pre-legislative scrutiny with the House—so that some of the conditions that would be needed to build consensus so that we could act rapidly and in agreement in an emergency were actually understood between us and in place. That process will be important in building the underlying consensus on which legislation can be passed in an emergency of that kind.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 724 c976
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Civil liberties Counter-terrorism Curfews Detainees Deportation Exclusion orders Foreign nationals Internet Local government Police Powers Mobile phones Photography Travel Terrorism Stop and search Surveillance Telecommunications Anti-terrorism control orders Radicalism Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation Counter-terrorism and Security Powers Review
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 14:05:31 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_706415
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_706415
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_706415