Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Blunkett (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 26 January 2011. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Counter-terrorism Review.


Counter-terrorism Review

May I sympathise with the Home Secretary in having to balance the protection of the British people with the political embarrassment of the Deputy Prime Minister? As she has already said, we all agree that prosecution and conviction would be preferred in cases where conspiracy to commit terrorist acts, or the preparation of such acts, are the issue. Will she therefore consider one more attempt to approach the senior judiciary and the legal profession to get agreement to change the rules on disclosure and admissibility of evidence, so that we can use due process through the courts in difficult circumstances such as those of the man known as AM who is being held on a control order? He has declared that he wishes to take his own life, and thereby the life of the British people. The consequence of that would be that we could not prosecute or convict him, because he would be dead.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
522 c315 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Access Disclosure of information Counter-terrorism Curfews Detainees Deportation Evidence Human rights Internet Terrorism Stop and search Surveillance Telecommunications Security Anti-terrorism control orders Terrorism prevention and investigation measures Counter-terrorism and Security Powers Review
Legislation
Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk