Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 26 January 2011. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Counter-terrorism Review.


Counter-terrorism Review

The Government have always had a commitment, including in the coalition agreement, to examine the possibility of using intercept material as evidence. It is on that basis that we have asked that further work be done to examine a number of issues associated with practicality, affordability and how an intercept-as-evidence regime could operate. It is a mistake for anybody in this House to think that using intercept as evidence is somehow the silver bullet that will take away all our other issues and requirements. Work has been done to examine existing cases and ask whether a prosecution would have been made possible had intercept as evidence been available. I believe that I am right in saying that in all cases—although I hesitate in saying ““all”” because I cannot remember the exact numbers—such evidence would not have made that possible. That is certainly true of most cases.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
522 c322 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Access Disclosure of information Counter-terrorism Curfews Detainees Deportation Evidence Human rights Internet Terrorism Stop and search Surveillance Telecommunications Security Anti-terrorism control orders Terrorism prevention and investigation measures Counter-terrorism and Security Powers Review
Legislation
Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk