Proceeding contribution from Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 26 January 2011. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Counter-terrorism Review.
Counter-terrorism Review
I am certainly happy to inform the House that I have had a positive reaction to the statement, in that the director general of the Security Service has told me that he considers that the changes provide an acceptable balance between the needs of security and of civil liberties and that the overall package mitigates risks. As we said in the review:"ββan approach that scrapped control orders and introduced more precisely focused and targeted restrictions, supported by increased covert investigative resources, would mitigate risk while increasing ""civil liberties. Such a scheme could better balance the priorities of prosecution and public protection.ββ" All parties will see that.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 522 c325-6
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Access Disclosure of information Counter-terrorism Curfews Detainees Deportation Evidence Human rights Internet Terrorism Stop and search Surveillance Telecommunications Security Anti-terrorism control orders Terrorism prevention and investigation measures Counter-terrorism and Security Powers Review
- Legislation
- Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 14:09:20 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_706642
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_706642
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_706642