Proceeding contribution from Andrew Mitchell (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 1 March 2011. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Aid Reviews.
Aid Reviews
I hear what the hon. Gentleman says, but it is important to recognise whether a British bilateral programme that is small compared with several other bilateral and multilateral programmes was having a real impact. We concluded that such a programme was not the best way of spending taxpayer's money.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 524 c179
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Developing countries Development aid Diseases Disease control Politics and government Maternity services Vaccination Reviews Malaria World Health Organization UNICEF UN Development Programme GAVI Alliance
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-11 18:14:32 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_719343
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_719343
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_719343