Proceeding contribution from Lord Clarke of Nottingham (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 29 March 2011. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Reforming Civil Justice.
Reforming Civil Justice
If my hon. Friend looks at our proposals, he will see that we intend to provide greater incentives for the settlement of cases. We also intend to impose cost penalties—beyond those that already exist—on those who either refuse good offers or do not meet the reasonable first demands of their opponents, but settlement is always preferable when it is possible. I think I shall have to discuss with the judiciary the question of whether wider circulation could be given to recent awards of damages. However, I agree that in this day and age it ought to be possible to move on a little from the old days when gossip among members of the Bar about what they considered to be the current tariff for a particular injury was the best way of spreading knowledge about the direction in which the figures were moving. I will discuss my hon. Friend's proposal with the Lord Chief Justice and others.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 526 c180
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Compensation Consumers Courts Administration of justice Civil proceedings Legal profession Fees and charges Legal aid scheme Legal representation Legal costs Personal injury Protection Recovery of costs Reform Small claims Civil Litigation Costs Review Civil law
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:44:48 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_732134
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_732134
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_732134