Proceeding contribution from Lord Clarke of Nottingham (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 31 March 2011. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Prisons Competition.
Prisons Competition
My right hon. Friend is right. There are two major voluntary parties with which the provider at Doncaster proposes to be in contact, but their names escape me—one is called Catch22 and the other is something else—and there will be local voluntary and charity groups subcontracted below them. Serco will manage the prison and will be the principal contractor, but the delivery that it hopes to achieve will be effected by subcontractors. I have emphasised to those who have attended seminars on this subject that I hope that the operator will deal responsibly with the small local contractors. Serco is entitled to use its bargaining power when negotiating with the representatives of Government to get the best deal it can, but I hope that it will not overdo it when dealing with smaller voluntary and charitable bodies that are also entitled to expect to boost their funds if they deliver the results required.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 526 c531
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Contracts Competition Finance Private sector Prisons Management Public expenditure National Offender Management Service HM Prison Service G4S HMP Birmingham Serco HMP Wellingborough HMP Oakwood HMP/YOI Doncaster HMP Buckley Hall
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:56:10 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_732892
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_732892
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_732892