Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Clarke of Nottingham (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 31 March 2011. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Prisons Competition.


Prisons Competition

Her Majesty's inspectorate of prisons does extremely valuable work and over the years, and has exposed things that can be praised or strongly criticised in both public and private sector prisons. If we look back over the years, we see that no rule and no measure can be produced that shows that either sector is overwhelmingly likely to produce praise while the other is overwhelmingly likely to produce criticism. We must look at the inspectorate's reports, take them seriously and ensure that where there are serious problems they are addressed. In my opinion—with respect—it is extremely out of date to say that what is wrong in such a case is the fact that the prison is private, whereas when another prison is criticised it somehow does not matter so much because it is public. The whole point of contracting and competition is that one specifies the quality one wants and the right price for the taxpayer, and then the inspectorate system ensures that real failings are addressed—and at the same time, we sometimes have penalties in the contract if providers fail to deliver.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
526 c532-3 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Contracts Competition Finance Private sector Prisons Management Public expenditure National Offender Management Service HM Prison Service G4S HMP Birmingham Serco HMP Wellingborough HMP Oakwood HMP/YOI Doncaster HMP Buckley Hall
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk