Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Danny Alexander (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 26 April 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Finance (No. 3) Bill.


Finance (No. 3) Bill

I have looked at those principles. The Government will, of course, respond to the Committee's report—along with other reports—in the usual way, but the principles seem very sensible. In fact, this is among the Finance Bills on which there has been the most consultation in advance. I believe that 260 of its 390-odd pages were published in draft some months before its publication. [Interruption.] I am replying to the question asked by the hon. Member for Chichester (Mr Tyrie). We have taken on board some of the principles to which he referred, but the Government must be able to respond to economic circumstances with their tax policy. As I have said, one of the predominant economic circumstances that we face is the high price of fuel. The Government considered that in order to relieve motorists of some of the burden on them—which we felt was incredibly important—we should ask the oil industry to pay a little more tax in the form of a supplementary charge.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
527 c70 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Children Alcoholic drinks Corporation tax Beer Air passenger duty Capital allowances Aggregates levy Environment protection Income tax Electricity generation Excise duties Fuels Economic growth Individual savings accounts Low incomes Northern Ireland Pensions Natural gas Nuclear power Business rates Prices Small businesses Tax allowances Tax avoidance Taxation Research Tobacco Science North Sea oil Carbon emissions Bank levy National employment savings trust scheme
Legislation
Finance (No. 3) Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk