Proceeding contribution from Mark Field (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 28 April 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (Amendment) Bill.
London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (Amendment) Bill
I accept that the 1908 and 1948 Olympics were nothing like as commercialised as next year’s will be. Such commercialism probably goes back to the Olympiads in 1984 in Los Angeles and 1996 in Atlanta. There is a sense that there has been creeping power in the hands of large commercial interests, with ever more draconian measures being put in place. For example, particular brands of soft drink will be barred within a particular radius. Has that always been the case in the modern Olympic era since there has been more commercialisation, or have commercial interests used an increasing amount of strength to ensure that we have the draconian measures that we will debate today?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 527 c367
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Armed forces Companies Advertising Fines Football Internet Police Local government finance Powers Public transport Marketing Sales Trade Sportsgrounds Roads Road traffic control Touting Street trading Tickets Seized articles Sponsorship Olympic Delivery Authority Olympic Games 2012 Paralympic Games 2012 Statutory instruments Weymouth
- Legislation
- London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (Amendment) Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:44:16 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_736630
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_736630
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_736630