Proceeding contribution from Andrew Gwynne (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 4 May 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Finance (No. 3) Bill.

Finance (No. 3) Bill

My right hon. Friend makes his case on clause 35 and says that the previous Labour Government considered the possibility of targeting. However, they did so in the context of a wider range of measures available to families to support them in the upbringing of children. Does he share my dismay that clause 35 is being introduced against a backdrop of absolutely clobbering families hard and removing benefits that have made a huge difference to them in my constituency, and no doubt in his?

Secondary information

Type: Proceeding contribution
Reference: 527 c723
Session: 2010-12
Chamber / Committee: House of Commons chamber
Subjects: Childcare Business Corporation tax Capital allowances Investment Equipment Economic growth Manufacturing industries Tax allowances Taxation Tax rates and bands
Legislation: Finance (No. 3) Bill 2010-12
Link: View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk

Finance (No. 3) Bill

Secondary information

Librarians' tools