Proceeding contribution from Andrew Gwynne (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 4 May 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Finance (No. 3) Bill.
Finance (No. 3) Bill
My hon. Friend has hit the nail on the head. Is not the underlying impact of clause 35 that the Government know that, although the allowance will be taken away from higher-rate taxpayers, many of those parents will still fund those places and make sacrifices elsewhere in their family budgets?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 527 c741
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Childcare Business Corporation tax Capital allowances Investment Equipment Economic growth Manufacturing industries Tax allowances Taxation Tax rates and bands
- Legislation
- Finance (No. 3) Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:52:53 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_738277
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_738277
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_738277