Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from David Heath (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 5 May 2011. It occurred during Adjournment debate and Backbench debate on General Debate.


General Debate

I will happily communicate that request to the Department. The Minister of State, Department for Transport is probably the appropriate Minister, and I will ask her whether such a meeting is possible. We will also see whether we can convey the concerns of the Government on this matter as well as those of individual Members. This matter may be of interest to the Department for Communities and Local Government. The hon. Gentleman said that he would like to see the London borough of Hillingdon hold nomination rights. Economic development issues will often be mediated by the Department and the local authorities, especially Hillingdon and, I suspect, Hounslow as well. I will bring his remarks to the attention of the DCLG in the hope that it will also have a view on the matter. I am grateful to him for everything that he said today. He made a compelling case on behalf of his constituents, and we all understand the difficulties that they face. My hon. Friend the Member for Sittingbourne and Sheppey prefaced his remarks by stressing some unavoidable facts in his constituency. Although we often hear that the south-east drives the economy and that its economic conditions are rather better than those in the rest of the country, constituencies such as his have genuine problems relating to employment and to ensuring that there is sufficient access to growth in the economy. He said that 3,000 of his constituents are out of work, which is too many. We can reduce the number of unemployed people by enabling business to develop. However, that is not something that Government do; they create not jobs but the environment in which private industry can create jobs. My hon. Friend told us some of the things that he is doing on behalf of his constituents. I am rather jealous of the acronym in his website—BLINKSS. It would not work for my constituency because it would become ““BLINKSF””, which sounds like a speech impediment. He is clearly attuned to the needs of his constituents. Despite the difficulties in north Kent, my hon. Friend listed a number of major employers in the area, such as the deepwater port, the steels works, the brick works, the paper mill, the distribution centre, the high-tech industries and the three prisons. The tourism industry is unrelated to the three prisons but, nevertheless, they co-exist.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
527 c345WH 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Construction Airports Environment protection Heathrow Airport Pollution Noise Roads Rural areas BAA
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk