Proceeding contribution from Viscount Eccles (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 17 May 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Postal Services Bill.
Postal Services Bill
My Lords, I am a bit bothered about the amendment that the noble Lord, Lord Young, spoke to because of the great difficulty for anybody to define ““effective competition”” in a statutory way. The competitive market for communications is very complicated. Ofcom is a very big and well established regulator that no doubt understands that market better than Postcomm did, but Ofcom still has to determine the regulatory framework that it is to follow. Work is going on in the last days of Postcomm that will not be completed until next year. That is not the only point. Effective competition includes digital competition. Many other means of communication have been developed that have superseded the forked stick, and I think that this amendment is a step too far. I cannot support it.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 727 c1264-5
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Privatisation Post offices Postal services Ofcom Post Office Regulation Reform Royal Mail Universal service obligation
- Legislation
- Postal Services Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 16:17:38 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_743420
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_743420
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_743420