Proceeding contribution from Lord Borrie (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 17 May 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Postal Services Bill.
Postal Services Bill
My Lords, subject to the questions that have usefully been asked by the noble Baroness, Lady Kramer, and to which the Minister will no doubt respond, the amendments proposed by my Front Bench and the noble Lord, Lord Low of Dalston, are useful and would have definite gains if they were accepted by the Government. I want to make two points. First, in relation to a review by Ofcom, which is provided for and to which one cannot in principle object, Amendment 66, in the names of my Front-Bench team, would confirm the uniform tariff. I do not see how the Minister can object to that; it is a brief and clear amendment. The second point, which was mentioned by both the noble Lord, Lord Low, and the opposition Front Bench, is that there should be a transitional period for the thing to work through. There should be a period in which there will be no change. That, too, seems a helpful and creative amendment, which has been modestly but clearly put forward.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 727 c1316-7
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Privatisation Post offices Postal services Ofcom Post Office Regulation Reform Royal Mail Universal service obligation
- Legislation
- Postal Services Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 16:17:21 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_743445
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_743445
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_743445