Proceeding contribution from Greg Clark (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 17 May 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Localism Bill.
Localism Bill (ways and means)
I do not want to stop the hon. Gentleman in his tracks, but I think that I can reassure him. He is operating on completely the wrong premise. There is no suggestion at all that a fine would be levied on an authority because of its performance on recycling rates. The only suggestion is that if the authority does not adopt a plan as required—that is, something specifically required of that authority—and if it has been warned that it needs to have one, that will be the occasion for a fine. That authority's performance is completely irrelevant, whatever it might be. I hope that that will reassure the hon. Gentleman and allow him to return to the issue at hand.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 528 c219
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Appeals Councillors Conduct Betting shops EU law Fines Fire and rescue services Electoral systems EU grants and loans Local government Pay Local government finance Powers Planning Opening hours Local government services Sustainable development Taxation Retail trade Sunday trading Secretaries of state Mayors Department for Communities and Local Government Community infrastructure levy
- Legislation
- Localism Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 16:27:02 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_743774
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_743774
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_743774