Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Graham P Jones (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 17 May 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Localism Bill.


Localism Bill (ways and means)

No. The Minister of State had the opportunity before to say what he has said this evening, but there are real issues—[Interruption.] That is fine, but it is the Government who are putting forward their new clause, which now has no teeth. In conclusion—because I was wrapping up—the LGA says that the proposal will be problematic to enforce. What are the Government enforcing? How can local government increase recycling rates for residents? If action is to be taken, it will hit some of the poorest communities that have higher recycling rates, not some of the wealthiest ones, and the same goes for landfill taxes. I appreciate Ministers' comments, but as far as I am concerned, I am delighted that all the teeth have been taken out of this proposal.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
528 c220 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Appeals Councillors Conduct Betting shops EU law Fines Fire and rescue services Electoral systems EU grants and loans Local government Pay Local government finance Powers Planning Opening hours Local government services Sustainable development Taxation Retail trade Sunday trading Secretaries of state Mayors Department for Communities and Local Government Community infrastructure levy
Legislation
Localism Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk