Proceeding contribution from Greg Clark (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 17 May 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Localism Bill.
Localism Bill (ways and means)
My hon. Friend anticipates the detail of the national policy planning framework, but at this stage all I would say on sustainable development is that the Government have no issue or disagreement with the classic definitions of it. The Brundtland definition, that development undertaken by this generation should not compromise the ability of future generations to live their lives, has stood the test of time and is very clear. Although I am foreshadowing the content of the framework, I want to give a clear signal to my hon. Friend and to all hon. Members that we intend to follow that approach.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 528 c264-5
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Appeals Councillors Conduct Betting shops EU law Fines Fire and rescue services Electoral systems EU grants and loans Local government Pay Local government finance Powers Planning Opening hours Local government services Sustainable development Taxation Retail trade Sunday trading Secretaries of state Mayors Department for Communities and Local Government Community infrastructure levy
- Legislation
- Localism Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 16:24:04 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_743808
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_743808
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_743808