Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Yvette Cooper (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 23 May 2011. It occurred during Opposition day on Policing and Crime.


Policing and Crime

Judicious only until the mayoral election, after which the number will be cut. The Mayor has realised, as Government Members everywhere else in the country seem not to have done, that the public do not like police cuts, so of course he is pretending to put the numbers up, having seen them fall already since the election. Government Members tell us that all these problems will be solved by cutting bureaucracy, but even the Home Secretary's most optimistic claims are to save the equivalent of 1,200 police officers in several years' time. Unfortunately, she is cutting 12,000 officers now. As for the A19s, you couldn't make it up, with up to 2,000 experienced officers being forced to take early retirement. Chief constables are being put in an impossible position, forced to use A19s to make the savings that their forces need. However, now we see, with the calculations from the House of Commons Library, that when we take into account the lost tax and pension contributions that those police officers and police authorities were making, forcing those officers to retire early will actually cost the taxpayer more. Tens of millions of pounds spent and thousands fewer experienced officers on the beat—how on earth does that fight crime?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
528 c706 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Databases CCTV Accountability Crime prevention Crime Finance Genetics Police Public expenditure
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk