Proceeding contribution from Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 23 May 2011. It occurred during Opposition day on Policing and Crime.
Policing and Crime
No. I do not accept the hon. Gentleman's argument at all, and in a few minutes I will address exactly that point about funding. Let us look at the facts. Our police forces understood perfectly well that they would have had to make reductions in staff numbers no matter which party was in power. The Home Affairs Committee, chaired by the right hon. Member for Leicester East (Keith Vaz), found that almost all police forces were predicting future staff losses by January 2010—months before the election. In fact, 21 police forces—almost half of all police forces—saw falling officer numbers in the five years up to March 2010, when we had a Labour Government. Indeed, as my hon. Friend the Member for Peterborough (Mr Jackson) said, when Labour's last Home Secretary was asked during the election campaign whether he could guarantee that police numbers would not fall under Labour, he answered no. The right hon. Member for Kingston upon Hull West and Hessle (Alan Johnson) understood that he could not guarantee police numbers, so why is the right hon. Lady not so straight with the public?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 528 c710
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Databases CCTV Accountability Crime prevention Crime Finance Genetics Police Public expenditure
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 16:14:26 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_745147
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_745147
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_745147