Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 9 June 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill.


Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill

My Lords, I am very grateful to the Minister for his comments in what has been a very interesting debate. It did indeed verge on the confessional, but I quite like that—I was a bit sad that the noble Viscount, Lord Astor, did not share with us what happened when his grandmother took the Dubonnet. Was it only one? No, he says. That was a great success, but probably not in the spirit of the debate that we have just been having. I also would like to take exception—although not in a serious way—with my noble friend Lord Soley. As the Minister has said, I detect in the younger generation a change in the way in which alcohol is consumed. It is not so much the volume they are drinking, which is probably constrained by physical reasons; it is that they are not drinking the wines and beers of older years. They are drinking spirits—drinking before they go out, when they go out and when they come back. They may indeed be mixing it with other stuff although I do not know about that. However, I think that the change in consumption pattern is something that we have to be very careful about. Of course, if you drink alcohol at a more concentrated level, you are going to have double or triple the effect on every other part of your body. I am very concerned about that. We need to take it into account as we look at the relevant policies. Nevertheless, what the other side has said is good in that the public health interests are being taken into account. I am grateful to the noble Lord for saying that. We look forward to hearing more about price, which is an interesting component of the overall policy, and perhaps in later debates we can get more detail on that. The idea that licensing authorities, or more of them, could be made responsible authorities so that the cumulative effects can be taken into account is a very important step forward again down this way. Taken together, if we genuinely believe that steps must be taken to try to address where we are in terms of alcohol abuse, then the discussions that we have had today will have been an important step along the road. We should work together, if we can, to take this forward. On that basis, I will withdraw Amendment 237A. Amendment 237A withdrawn. Clause 105 agreed. Clause 106 : Premises licences: who may make relevant representations Amendment 237B Clause 106 : Premises licences: who may make relevant representations Amendment 237B Moved by


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
728 c463 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Complaints Children Abuse Accountability Clubs Discipline Alcoholic drinks Anti-social behaviour Civil proceedings British Transport Police Inspections Health and safety Exemptions Licensed premises HM Inspectorate of Constabulary Protection Police Nuisance Powers Public places Licensing laws Noise Police authorities Off-licences Music Standards Sales Young people Young offenders Reform Trespass Serious Organised Crime Agency Music festivals Police and crime commissioners National Crime Agency Police and crime panels Youth rehabilitation orders
Legislation
Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk