Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord De Mauley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 9 June 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill.


Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill

My Lords, I am most grateful to my noble friend for raising a matter which is very close to my heart. I will reflect upon what he has said and revert to him, perhaps, in writing. Clause 106 agreed. Clause 107 agreed. Clause 108: Club premises certificates: who may make relevant representations Clause 108: Club premises certificates: who may make relevant representations Amendment 239A not moved. Clause 108 agreed. Clause 109 agreed Clause 110: Reducing the burden: premises licences Amendment 240 Clause 110: Reducing the burden: premises licences Amendment 240 Moved by


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
728 c469 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Complaints Children Abuse Accountability Clubs Discipline Alcoholic drinks Anti-social behaviour Civil proceedings British Transport Police Inspections Health and safety Exemptions Licensed premises HM Inspectorate of Constabulary Protection Police Nuisance Powers Public places Licensing laws Noise Police authorities Off-licences Music Standards Sales Young people Young offenders Reform Trespass Serious Organised Crime Agency Music festivals Police and crime commissioners National Crime Agency Police and crime panels Youth rehabilitation orders
Legislation
Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk