Proceeding contribution from Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 20 June 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Localism Bill.
Localism Bill
Before my noble friend sits down, will she confirm that she has repeated the explanation that was given in the memorandum to the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments about the difference between subsections (1) and (2), which the Joint Committee expressly and firmly said that it did not accept? Is she now firmly saying that she will nevertheless insist on the difference—an affirmative resolution for an order under subsection (1) but a negative resolution for an order under subsection (2)? If so, I would find that difficult to accept.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 728 c1098
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Devolved matters Community development Devolution Council tax Contracts for services Fees and charges Land Legislative competence Legislation Fire and rescue services Local government Ministerial powers Public transport Referendums Local government services Parish and town councils Passenger transport executives Recreation spaces Parks Sustainable development Wales Rights of way Rescue services Mayors
- Legislation
- Localism Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 16:37:05 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_750826
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_750826
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_750826