Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord True (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 20 June 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Localism Bill.


Localism Bill

My Lords, it could be that my attention wandered a little, in which case I apologise to the noble Lord. Looking at his amendment, it appears to me that a number of the powers conferred on the Secretary of State by this amendment are precisely the powers which the noble Lord was arguing earlier should be removed or struck down in relation to local authorities. Perhaps the noble Lord could reassure me where the party opposite is because new Section 98C is a twin of Clause 5, which we were discussing earlier, and new Section 98D is a twin of Clause 7, which we were also discussing earlier. Perhaps the noble Lord would explain where the party opposite lies in relation to local authorities and ITAs.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
728 c1138 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Devolved matters Community development Devolution Council tax Contracts for services Fees and charges Land Legislative competence Legislation Fire and rescue services Local government Ministerial powers Public transport Referendums Local government services Parish and town councils Passenger transport executives Recreation spaces Parks Sustainable development Wales Rights of way Rescue services Mayors
Legislation
Localism Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk