Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 29 June 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Transport for London (Supplemental Toll Provisions) Bill [HL].


Transport for London (Supplemental Toll Provisions) Bill [HL]

I shall be brief in my comments on the Bill. I was a member of the board of Transport for London when the congestion charge was brought in and chaired all the public meetings on that issue. I have been an open opponent of the Thames Gateway Bridge, so am very glad that that project has been scuttled. I should like to ask two questions about the Bill, just by way of seeking confirmation. Do all the usual processes of planning, consultation and approval remain in place, even though this mechanism provides the funding for any new river crossing that might be tolled? Secondly, could this framework apply to other projects carried out by Transport for London? For example—since we have had many discussions on air quality—if there were to be a low-emissions zone and it was decided to toll cars that did not meet the relevant emissions standard as they entered the zone, could this framework again be used for that purpose? It is a framework that London might turn to, particularly at the time of the Olympics. Although I seek confirmation on those matters, I am very supportive of the Bill.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
728 c1820 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Bridges Greater London Exhaust emissions Private bills Road traffic Roads Tolls Transport for London Thames Gateway Silvertown
Legislation
Transport for London (Supplemental Toll Provisions) Bill (HL) 2006-07 to 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk