Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord True (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 7 July 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Localism Bill.


Localism Bill

I certainly have doubts as to whether we need a list of assets of community value and a list of things that are not of community value. We already have a lot of lists and a lot of local knowledge. As I said at the conclusion of my remarks, neighbourhood planning should lead to greater local awareness and involvement. It may be a better mechanism for releasing resources and it would be on a better timescale, because this is, essentially, emergency legislation and you have six months to save it. That is how it all started. Compiling the lists is extremely complex and would relate to any use to which any of the land could be put. It states in the discussion paper that the local authority could consider former or current use, any planning policies, any use for the asset that the nominator is proposing, community support provided by the nominator, any statutory provisions affecting the asset, or any alternative sites in the neighbourhood that could serve the same purpose. I wonder whether some of the people who drafted this Bill would care to volunteer to give their time to some of the local authorities in this country to prepare for and work on those kinds of lists.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
729 c373 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Compensation Community development Assets Buildings Land Infrastructure Local government Property transfer Planning Property Public houses Post offices Local plans Transport Sustainable development Sportsgrounds Rural areas Regional spatial strategies Local development frameworks National policy statements
Legislation
Localism Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk