Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord True (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 7 July 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Localism Bill.


Localism Bill

I understand the point made by my noble friend the Minister, but I have some sympathy with the amendment, for reasons that she will understand from my previous interventions. I do not think that this is easy, and I look forward with interest, as many other noble Lords in this Committee will, to seeing the regulations and the guidance that her department will produce. The Minister was very receptive to that point when it was made by noble Lords two days ago and today. There are circumstances in which a local authority, using its reasonable discretion, could cut short a bureaucratic process that is pre-eminently likely to end in the rejection of a nomination. I really do not see why, taking its local circumstances into account, a local authority should not be given slightly greater freedom than is presently suggested in the Bill. I understand my noble friend’s argument and that of my noble friend Lord Howard, but in many ways I slightly move towards my noble friend Lord Howard’s because I hope that some degree of latitude and discretion will be allowed.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
729 c402 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Compensation Community development Assets Buildings Land Infrastructure Local government Property transfer Planning Property Public houses Post offices Local plans Transport Sustainable development Sportsgrounds Rural areas Regional spatial strategies Local development frameworks National policy statements
Legislation
Localism Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk