Proceeding contribution from Lord Beecham (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 7 July 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Localism Bill.
Localism Bill
My Lords, this amendment reverts to the issue that I raised previously about districts within counties and who is to be the appropriate authority. It suggests a framework whereby there may be a shared interest that might be disposed of between the two tiers within county areas. I am not asking for a decision on that today but perhaps it is something that we might look at. The views of the Local Government Association might be taken on how best to deal with these matters. I suspect there may well be cases where at county level there is an interest—at district level, possibly not—and it would be invidious if there was a refusal by a district council when the county council might wish to accede to a request. It is worth exploring that grey area further. If the noble Baroness will indicate that discussions can take place, I would be very happy. I beg to move.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 729 c428
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Compensation Community development Assets Buildings Land Infrastructure Local government Property transfer Planning Property Public houses Post offices Local plans Transport Sustainable development Sportsgrounds Rural areas Regional spatial strategies Local development frameworks National policy statements
- Legislation
- Localism Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:45:55 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_758227
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_758227
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_758227