Proceeding contribution from Lord Lucas (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 7 July 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Localism Bill.
Localism Bill
I am sorry if I coupled those words in the wrong way. I meant that it had to be both. It has to be the wettest because clearly we do not want to put a lot of houses where there is a water shortage. Having decided where it is wet enough, you then choose the least attractive place. I am sure that we can all have arguments about where it should be, but clearly it is not Kent or Norfolk.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 729 c445
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Compensation Community development Assets Buildings Land Infrastructure Local government Property transfer Planning Property Public houses Post offices Local plans Transport Sustainable development Sportsgrounds Rural areas Regional spatial strategies Local development frameworks National policy statements
- Legislation
- Localism Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:47:09 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_758255
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_758255
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_758255