Proceeding contribution from Lord Marland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 14 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on Fuel: Electricity Supply Licences.
Fuel: Electricity Supply Licences
My Lords, I can answer that straightaway. Let me make it clear that we considered every option. A whole magnitude of options are put forward in reviews and consultations with industry, so of course we considered other options. However, the option that was actually put to us, largely by industry, suggested that the contribution of FITs was going to be even more expensive than it is now, and I am afraid that that was an option that we were not going to embark upon. In closing, I see no real sense in the feed-in tariff at the level that it was. We have made the right and brave decision. It is a decision to support the consumer, which is obviously a priority for the noble Lord, Lord Whitty. It saves consumers from a vast increase in bills on a form of electricity generation that is not really going to impact on the importance and size of the problem ahead of us.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 729 c899-900
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Energy Electricity generation Electricity Microgeneration Renewable energy Solar power Feed-in tariffs
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 18:09:15 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_761074
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_761074
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_761074