Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 14 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill.


Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill

I note that my noble friend Lord Lester raised this matter in the Policing and Crime Bill 2009, and that at that stage undertakings were given by the noble Lord, Lord Brett, on behalf of the then Government to consult the police on the unintended consequences. That was reiterated on Report, and in February of last year, the noble Lord, Lord Bach, said that consultation had not yet taken place, and it still has not taken place. I do not think that it is appropriate that this matter should be put on the shelf until we have another Bill into which it can be inserted. It is very important that the police should not be able to shelter behind a provision that clearly was not designed for them, as the noble Lord, Lord Bach, has just acknowledged. Consequently, I propose to test the opinion of the House. Division on Amendment 244A Contents 135; Not-Contents 136. Amendment 244A disagreed. Schedule 14 : Police: complaints Amendment 245 Moved by


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
729 c852-3 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Complaints Clubs Alcoholic drinks Anti-social behaviour Civil proceedings City of Westminster Fees and charges Greater London Drugs Exemptions Licensed premises Drunkenness Police Property transfer Parliament Square Protest Misuse Opening hours Private prosecutions Young people Reform Trespass Royal parks War crimes Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs Police and crime commissioners Night-time economy
Legislation
Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk