Proceeding contribution from Lord Carlile of Berriew (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 14 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill.
Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill
I am sorry but that is not good enough. Will my noble friend now answer my question? He has left hanging in the air the possibility that the Director of Public Prosecutions has indicated his agreement to this amendment. Is that true or untrue? I believe that it is untrue. The implication should not be left hanging in the air. Perhaps my noble friend will bear in mind that I am exercising more self-control than his last few sentences possibly justify.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 729 c951-2
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Clubs Alcoholic drinks Anti-social behaviour Civil proceedings City of Westminster Fees and charges Greater London Drugs Exemptions Licensed premises Drunkenness Police Property transfer Parliament Square Protest Misuse Opening hours Private prosecutions Young people Reform Trespass Royal parks War crimes Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs Police and crime commissioners Night-time economy
- Legislation
- Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 18:08:49 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_761234
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_761234
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_761234