Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 7 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Police (Detention and Bail) Bill.


Police (Detention and Bail) Bill

My hon. Friend sneaked in with his intervention as I was nearing the conclusion of my speech. Perhaps I use the term ““retrospective”” a little loosely. This is not retrospective legislation in that it merely corrects the decision that has recently been made and puts the situation back to what it had been understood to be. That is supported by Liberty, which has said:"““We do not believe that the proposals are retrospective in their nature as they do not seek retrospectively to create a criminal offence, sanction or other burden. They would, in our view, not fall foul of Article 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights or the common law rule against retrospective penalties.””"


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
530 c1686 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Criminal investigation Bail Association of Chief Police Officers Legal opinion Police Greater Manchester Police Sunset clauses
Legislation
Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
Police (Detention and Bail) Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk