Proceeding contribution from Keith Vaz (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 7 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Police (Detention and Bail) Bill.
Police (Detention and Bail) Bill
Evidence was given to the Select Committee on Home Affairs on Tuesday that a note was written by counsel for Greater Manchester police, which could have alerted officials to a possible issue, but my right hon. Friend would need to have the opportunity to read that note. The point I wanted to make was that there is the Treasury Solicitor's Department, which is headed by the Attorney-General and the Solicitor-General, so there are resources that could have allowed this issue to be looked at when ACPO was taking advice from Clare Montgomery and Steven Kovats. Does my right hon. Friend agree that that is relevant for the future and that, if alarm bells start ringing again, there is machinery in Government to allow the Home Secretary to have the kind of advice we are talking about?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 530 c1693
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Criminal investigation Bail Association of Chief Police Officers Legal opinion Police Greater Manchester Police Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
- Police (Detention and Bail) Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:58:26 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_761875
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_761875
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_761875