Proceeding contribution from Mark Reckless (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 7 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Police (Detention and Bail) Bill.
Police (Detention and Bail) Bill
Will the shadow Home Secretary accept that the Government and the Home Office were not parties in the proceedings? We can see from the judgment that counsel for Greater Manchester police were asked at the end of the oral judgment whether they would like to apply for a certificate in relation to an appeal. To the extent that questions have to be asked, surely they should be addressed to Greater Manchester police about why they did not apply to the judge for a stay or for a certificate despite having been specifically asked about doing so. We should be addressing those questions to Greater Manchester police, who are party to the case, rather than trying to twist this in relation to the Home Office.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 530 c1693-4
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Criminal investigation Bail Association of Chief Police Officers Legal opinion Police Greater Manchester Police Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
- Police (Detention and Bail) Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:58:25 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_761877
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_761877
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_761877