Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Herbert of South Downs (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 7 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Police (Detention and Bail) Bill.


Police (Detention and Bail) Bill

The right hon. Lady continues to seek to make what appears to me to be political hay out of this situation when the Government are doing everything they can to redress it. I noted yesterday that she made the absurd suggestion that somehow there had been a delay regarding the Supreme Court's refusal to grant a stay of execution, which might have explained why it refused the stay. On her own analysis, the Supreme Court would have granted a stay of execution—or might have done so—when the implications of this judgment were not clear, yet for some reason it decided not to grant the stay of execution when the implications were made clear. The right hon. Lady takes a whole set of completely inconsistent positions simply because she wants to make political points that are inappropriate when we are seeking to address a serious political matter. Let me return to the impact on the police and to specific questions—


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
530 c1716 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Criminal investigation Bail Association of Chief Police Officers Legal opinion Police Greater Manchester Police Sunset clauses
Legislation
Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
Police (Detention and Bail) Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk