Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Davies of Stamford (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 19 July 2011. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Schools: Funding Reform.


Schools: Funding Reform

My Lords, the noble Baroness is a very distinguished Member of this House, but I think Labour Back-Benchers are the only group who have not had a turn so far. We have a certain amount of time. On design, did not the Victorians produce some extremely distinguished school buildings that have stood the test of time on the basis of just three or four rather standardised models? I hope the Minister will look at that example and perhaps be inspired by it. On revenue funding, at first sight, one sees that it appears very just and sensible to cut back proportionately revenue funding to LEAs where a portion of that funding is earmarked for services that are now being paid for directly by funding academies. However, is it not the case that there are very considerable economies of scale in education, including in the operation of LEAs, and that the administrative and other fixed costs of those LEAs in providing those services will now, under this new system, fall on a reduced volume of funding for the LEA schools and therefore be a higher proportion of that funding? Therefore, schools that remain within the LEA system, will lose out, simply because there are academies in that area, and they will lose out more, the more academies there are in that area. Surely that is not fair either.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
729 c1279-80 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Construction Capital investment Design Finance Judicial review Local government finance Public consultation Standards Repairs and maintenance Surveys Academies Building schools for the future programme Education Capital Review Maintained schools
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk