Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Newton of Braintree (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 19 July 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Localism Bill.


Localism Bill

I apologise but whatever may be true in towns, perhaps I might give a direct illustration. My wife's ward on Braintree District Council is called Coggeshall and North Feering. The neighbouring ward is Feering and Kelvedon, and I need hardly say that North Feering almost certainly sees itself as more closely related for most purposes with Feering and Kelvedon than with Coggeshall, which is roughly two and a half to three miles away. The reason for this is that the ward boundaries have been drawn to produce reasonable equality in order to justify the numbers of councillors. They have nothing to do with the sort of things that we are talking about. Again, we are seeking flexibility, not a straitjacket.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
729 c1228 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Community development Advertising Conservation Infrastructure Electric cables Local government Planning permission Planning Public consultation Referendums Railways Property development Parish and town councils National parks Local plans Travellers Urban areas Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements Community infrastructure levy
Legislation
Localism Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk