Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hanham (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 19 July 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Localism Bill.
Localism Bill
148ZB: Schedule 9, page 305, leave out lines 5 and 6 and insert— ““(5) If— (a) there are two applicable referendums under that Schedule (because the order relates to a neighbourhood area designated as a business area under section 61GA), and (b) in one of those referendums (but not the other) more than half of those voting have voted in favour of the order, the authority may (but need not) make a neighbourhood development order to which the proposal relates.””
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 729 c1239
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Community development Advertising Conservation Infrastructure Electric cables Local government Planning permission Planning Public consultation Referendums Railways Property development Parish and town councils National parks Local plans Travellers Urban areas Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements Community infrastructure levy
- Legislation
- Localism Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:52:24 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_763173
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_763173
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_763173