Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Valentine (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 19 July 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Localism Bill.


Localism Bill

I support the government amendments but would like to make one suggestion about simplification. There should be two votes in all cases, a business and a residential vote, except where either businesses or residents are a negligible presence in the neighbourhood area. The benefit of that would be that the local authority can test the mood of both residents and business. Where they agree, the vote would be binding, but where they disagree the solution is likely to be a mediated solution rather than a yes/no vote. That is likely to represent a more sustainable solution where the residents and businesses vote differently. My plea would be for there to be a business and residential vote in most situations, with the local authority taking the casting vote. From a civic society point of view, the businesses would never override the residential vote and the default would be for the local authority to take the view.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
729 c1240-1 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Community development Advertising Conservation Infrastructure Electric cables Local government Planning permission Planning Public consultation Referendums Railways Property development Parish and town councils National parks Local plans Travellers Urban areas Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements Community infrastructure levy
Legislation
Localism Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk