Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 20 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Education Bill.


Education Bill

My Lords, our names have been added to Amendments 115 and 118, so I will speak very briefly. First, I agree with the noble Baroness, Lady Walmsley, about the narrow focus on educational achievement which ignores the wider role of education in providing a safe and happy environment where all children can thrive and be healthy and confident. We believe that well-being should include such things as nutrition, exercise, relationships, respect for each other and how to overcome low self-esteem. A good school will include all this in the curriculum, but it does not mean that we should exempt all schools from having that assessed and checked from time to time. The noble Lord, Lord Ouseley, gave a very coherent case for why Amendment 118 is important. It is important that we check that the Government’s rhetoric when they introduced the pupil premium can be backed up by independent assessment in the longer term, particularly in light of the new autonomous school structures. If we are not careful, disadvantaged children will get left behind. We need independent assessment to double- check that all is going well with the way that the money is being spent. I sense people’s frustration at the late hour and I will say no more at this stage.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
729 c490-1GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Curriculum Buildings Design Equality Education Governing bodies Inspections Exemptions Faith schools Languages Local government Public appointments Pupils Primary education Standards Vocational guidance Religion Safety Students Academies Free schools Ofsted Maintained schools
Legislation
Education Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk