Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 20 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill.
Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill
My Lords, does my noble friend agree that her amendment, which I certainly would not describe as infamous, was the result of concern in the House that the model being proposed did not contain the strict checks and balances that most of us wish to see? Therefore, picking up the concern of the noble Lord, Lord Harris of Haringey, it would be entirely proper for the Government to come back on ping-pong with proposals reflecting, beyond Clause 1, the strict checks and balances which led to the original amendment.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 729 c1342
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Accountability Crime Audit Compulsory purchase Finance Land Elections Greater London Police Powers Public appointments Political parties Mayor of London Political impartiality Reform Police and crime commissioners Statutory instruments Police and crime panels
- Legislation
- Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:40:02 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_764401
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_764401
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_764401