Proceeding contribution from Lord Empey (Ulster Unionist Party) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 6 September 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Armed Forces Bill.
Armed Forces Bill
My Lords, I thank the Minister for his response. I agree with the noble Lord, Lord Ramsbotham, that the Minister and his colleagues will wish to reflect on the debate, and we will wish to reflect on what he has said. As the noble Lord, Lord Tunnicliffe, said, the phraseology that we have used in these amendments may not be ideal. Nevertheless, I think there is a consensus in the Committee that there needs to be some way—I do not wish this to clash with the devolution settlement in any way—of allowing Parliament to ensure that the various component parts of the UK are co-operating in this regard. If that is not done, they may diverge over time. That is something none of us would wish to see. As I say, we will wish to reflect on the Minister’s response. Amendment 14 not moved. Amendments 15 and 16 not moved. Clause 2 agreed. Amendment 17 Moved by
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 730 c46GC
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Conditions of employment Crime Alcoholic drinks Armed forces Annual reports Discharges Coroners Advocacy Housing Health services Education Drugs Mental illness Ministerial duties Misuse Ministers Military law Young people Service Complaints Commissioner Veterans
- Legislation
- Armed Forces Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 21:01:42 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_766575
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_766575
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_766575