Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 6 September 2011. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Equality Act 2010 (Specific Duties) Regulations 2011.


Equality Act 2010 (Specific Duties) Regulations 2011

My Lords, my noble friend Lord Waddington’s amendment would not prevent the passing of these regulations. It is an amendment that regrets a certain result from the present situation; that is all. That is well expressed in a press release that the Equalities and Human Rights Commission issued on 11 August. It applied for leave to intervene in the cases to which the noble Lord, Lord Lester, referred. It said then: "““If given leave to intervene, the Commission will argue that the way existing human rights and equality law has been interpreted by judges is insufficient to protect freedom of religion or belief””." The commission has withdrawn that as a result of representations made to it, which does not entirely increase my confidence in its independence, but that is what it said originally. That is really what my noble friend’s amendment expresses; it seeks not to change what the regulations are proposing but simply to express a concern that may be taken into account in whatever emerges in future.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
730 c140 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Conditions of employment Equality Discrimination Public sector Public bodies Staff Christianity
Legislation
Equality Act 2010 (Specific Duties) Regulations 2011
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk