Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Goldsmith (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 8 September 2011. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Baha Mousa Inquiry.


Baha Mousa Inquiry

My Lords, I apologise, too, for not being here at the beginning of the Statement but I have been able to read it. There was misinformation about what time the noble Lord would be standing up. I welcome the Statement and the report. I ask the Minister, first, to consider whether he agrees that it entirely vindicates the decision taken, although criticised at the time, to bring prosecutions. Secondly, would he also agree that there remain questions to be answered, which Sir William Gage said were not a part of his inquiry, as to how the criminal investigations took place? The Minister may recall that he and I have debated these matters before on concerns that I have in relation to that. Thirdly, would he agree—I have in mind statements that he himself made in July 2005 in this House on a debate on prosecutions—that it would not be right in the light of these findings to describe a need to look at these matters in the light of law as anything to do with political correctness? What undermines respect for the discipline and for the armed services is not trying to uncover what took place and to deal with it, but the sort of circumstances that sadly we now know from Sir William Gage did take place and with at least the absence of knowledge of senior officers, standing by and not doing anything.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
730 c468-9 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Abuse Detainees Death Army Iraq Prosecutions Peacekeeping operations Training Baha Mousa Inquiry Iraq Historic Allegations Team Queen's Lancashire Regiment Mousa, Baha
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk