Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 12 September 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Localism Bill.


Localism Bill

My Lords, as the noble Lord, Lord Jenkin, has indicated, we are pleased to put our name to these amendments. We thank the Government for responding to at least one of the amendments, which means that the noble Lord will not have to introduce that one. The issues, as the noble Lord has explained, seem to be extremely straightforward and clear-cut. The consultation simply seeks for London boroughs parity with what happens to the London Assembly and for them not to have to go through the indirect route for the reasons that the noble Lord has explained and to make sure that there is fair representation. The Government have recognised that there should be representation for the boroughs on MDC boards. It seems a natural and reasonable extension to that that there should be representation on committees and sub-committees. Having said that, I fully support the amendments tabled by the noble Lord.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
730 c507-8 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Consumers Advisory services Fees and charges Elections Greater London Greater London Authority Fire and rescue services District councils Local government Protection Planning Public transport Railways Passengers Mayor of London Passenger transport executives London Transport Users' Committee Mayoral development corporations Transport for London Regeneration Economic prosperity boards Mayors
Legislation
Localism Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk