Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 12 September 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Localism Bill.


Localism Bill

My Lords, I am delighted that I have been able to stir up some debate on this issue and see it get some attention—rather than slip to its usual place at the bottom of everybody’s priority list—because there are some genuine issues here. I say to those who are concerned about passengers outside the London area that most people have London as their destination, and are therefore intensely important to TfL; they are not marginal. Also, most people who come in contribute in some way to London’s economic viability, either through business or entertainment, and so are very much a concern to Transport for London even though they do not actually live within the area. Again, we can also bring in other board members. I am delighted to have sparked off some of this debate. Given that, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 109 withdrawn. Clause 5 : Powers to make supplemental provision Amendment 109A Clause 5 : Powers to make supplemental provision Amendment 109A Moved by


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
730 c544-5 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Consumers Advisory services Fees and charges Elections Greater London Greater London Authority Fire and rescue services District councils Local government Protection Planning Public transport Railways Passengers Mayor of London Passenger transport executives London Transport Users' Committee Mayoral development corporations Transport for London Regeneration Economic prosperity boards Mayors
Legislation
Localism Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk