Proceeding contribution from Lord Beecham (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 12 September 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Localism Bill.
Localism Bill
I am grateful to the Minister for her reply. I accept that there now appears to be at least a parliamentary procedure here. I still think it is difficult to accept the notion that primary legislation imposing duties that were imposed for a purpose on local authorities and others should be varied or revoked in the way set out in the Bill. Having noted the point about the affirmative procedure, however, I accept her assurances and beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 109A withdrawn. Amendment 109B Moved by
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 730 c548
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Consumers Advisory services Fees and charges Elections Greater London Greater London Authority Fire and rescue services District councils Local government Protection Planning Public transport Railways Passengers Mayor of London Passenger transport executives London Transport Users' Committee Mayoral development corporations Transport for London Regeneration Economic prosperity boards Mayors
- Legislation
- Localism Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-06-30 18:35:21 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_768608
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_768608
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_768608